danceviewtimes
writers on dancing

 

Tribute to Ashton

“Scènes de ballet”, “Divertissements”, “Daphnis and Chloe”
The Royal Ballet
Covent Garden ROH

London
November 13 – 25, 2004

by John Percival
copyright © 2004 by John Percival

Four of Frederick Ashton’s full-evening ballets will be danced by the Royal Ballet this season (i.e. all of them except “Romeo and Juliet”, which the company never obtained—is it too late?), and nine of his one-act works plus a group of divertissements. What might seem odd, however, is that the shorter ballets are mainly offered on mixed bills with other works by George Balanchine, David Bintley, Christopher Bruce, Kenneth MacMillan, Bronislava Nijinska, Christopher Wheeldon. How well this will work as an Ashton commemoration remains to be seen, but we have just had the only all-Ashton mixed bill, and it was a real treat.

The programme offered two familiar ballets and six short numbers including the British premiere of two dances from “Devil’s Holiday”. All but one of the roles had at least two casts, and it’s no surprise that which works pleased most depended on whom you caught on any given evening. The one constant factor was Tamara Rojo dancing the “Five Brahms Waltzes in the manner of Isadora Duncan”, and she was just magnificent. How did she get to do this better than anyone else? Was it through studying some of the many pictures of Duncan dancing, or did she acquire her understanding simply from her response to the music and movement, or by following supremely well the coaching by Lynn Seymour, for whom the role was created? Whatever the explanation, I found Ms. Rojo’s performance overwhelming and felt this was exactly what Ashton had wanted us to see, his memory of the great artist he watched as a young man. Ms. Rojo deserved a better pianist than the competent Philip Gammon (and he deserved to be amplified when playing the introduction behind the house curtain). But that apart—terrific.

You do know, don’t you, that artistic director Monica Mason got rid of the appalling re-design commissioned by her predecessor-but-one, Anthony Dowell, for “Daphnis and Chloe”? So we have this big, ambitious ballet danced again in the setting wished for by its choreographer and its original designer, the painter John Craxton, who was under 30 at the time, and responsible for giving his beloved Greece a look at once timeless and contemporary. “Daphnis”, the best current realisation of Ravel’s great score, was already revived last season, and it is gratifying that some of the dancers now show a stronger grasp of their roles, which augurs well for the total effect of this Ashton season. The better cast had Federico Bonelli partnering Alina Cojocaru’s debut in the title roles, with Marianella Nunez as Lykanion, the young married woman who teaches Daphnis how to make love, Thiago Soares as Dorkon (whose designs on Chloe are not fulfilled), and José Martin as the pirate chief Bryaxis. Happily, one of their performances was filmed by BBC tv.

That same night also saw the best of three casts in the other main work, “Scènes de ballet”, with Miyako Yoshida and Ivan Putrov in the leads. A little thought apropos “Scènes”: Ashton may well have wanted to make it watchable from any angle, as he is often quoted; but surely it is time to recognise that it didn’t end up that way. The choreography quite definitely has a front, back and sides; this adds to the strong theatricality it possesses in spite of having no lot. Amazing to think that when the ballet was new in 1948, we all found Stravinsky’s score very difficult going, yet now it seems so tuneful that one can easily sing along with it.

I was not bowled over by all the divertissements. The Awakening pas de deux, for instance, which Ashton made for a new “Sleeping Beauty” production in 1968, though it had worked pleasantly in that context, is a rather mild-mannered piece to do on its own, especially with Darcey Bussell looking off form or her alternate Jaimie Tapper out of place. Reticent applause suggested that the audience agreed with me. And we do seem to get the “Thais (Meditation) pas de deux” often enough that it could have given way to something less familiar. Soares made much of the male role, with Mara Galeazzi; the other cast had Bonelli supporting the new recruit from Boston, Sarah Lamb, in her RB solo debut. I’m sorry to say that she made sadly little impression on me in this; better luck another time, perhaps.

The duet “Voices of Spring” came off more excitingly. A brash showpiece, originally given as an extra in the opera “Die Fledermaus”, it was danced with inimitable bravura by the crisp-stepping Leanne Benjamin and the exuberant Carlos Acosta. Their alternates, Galeazzi and Viacheslav Samodurov, were only marginally less brilliant, and seemed to find even more fun in the number (was Ashton just slightly sending up the showing-off quality of his original cast, Merle Park and Wayne Eagling?)

What about the two dances from “Devil’s Holiday”, never seen on stage by their choreographer thanks to war breaking out in September 1939, and now receiving their London premiere just 65 years later? Yes, American audiences have already had the chance to see them, but the comments I had read gave me little idea what to expect. The solo and duet were given separately (with the Isadora dances between them). I felt that these numbers were not ideal to be seen out of context—they clearly carried a meaning and we were not told even who the characters were, nor the plot they fitted into. All the same, naturally I was delighted to see some unfamiliar choreography by Ashton, and grateful to the incredible memory of Frederic Franklin who originally danced and has now staged them. Martin Harvey, whom I saw first, was a replacement for the announced Ricardo Cervera, and perhaps through limited preparation he seemed to me not to have got to grips with the role. But Viasheslav Samodurov, in the other cast, really did convey what Mr. Franklin describes in a programme quote as Ashton’s wish for “the emotion to come through the choreography … to express through the arms and the body” without making any faces. “Choreography for male dancers today tends to emphasise the technical more than the lyrical aspects of dancing”, Franklin says, and he and Samodurov have succeeded here in achieving the lyrical quality of the solo, with evocative ports de bras and frequent descents to the floor. A pity that Isabel McMeekan, in this cast, didn’t succeed so well with the duet; Laura Morera had made more of it with Mr. Harvey. However, these dances were warmly welcomed by the audience, who enthusiastically greeted Franklin too when he took a call with his casts. There can have been few of us present who remembered him as a dancer (yes, such an expressive one), but it was good to see him again on stage, although in street clothes. And it is pleasing that, despite spending most of his career in America, this Englishman’s life work was acknowledged by appointment as CBE (Coatmmander of the Most Honourable Order of the British Empire) which the Queen conferred on him at Buckingham Palace during his stay.

Photos (all by Dee Conway):
First:  Tamara Rolo in "Five Brahms Wzltzes in the Manner of Isadora Duncan."
Second: Alina Cojocaru and Federico Bonelli in "Daphnis and Chloe."
Third: Miyoko Yoshida held aloft in "Scenes de ballet."
Fourth:  Isabelle McKeekan, Viasheslav Samodurov in the pas de deux from "Devil's Holiday".  Photo:  Dee Conway.

Volume 2, No. 44
November 22, 2004

www.danceviewtimes.com
Copyright ©2004 by John Percival

 

DanceView Times

What's On This Week
Index of Reviews
Index of Writers

Back Issues
About Us
Links

Sister Sites:
DanceView
Ballet Alert! Online
Ballet Talk
Ballet Blogs

 

Writers
Mindy Aloff
Dale Brauner
Mary Cargill
Christopher Correa
Clare Croft
Nancy Dalva
Rita Felciano
Marc Haegeman
George Jackson
Gia Kourlas
Sali Ann Kriegsman
Alexander Meinertz
Tehreema Mitha
Gay Morris
Ann Murphy
Paul Parish
John Percival
Susan Reiter
Jane Simpson
Alexandra Tomalonis (Editor)
Lisa Traiger
Meital Waibsnaider

Kathrine Sorley Walker
Leigh Witchel

DanceView

 

DanceView is available by subscription ONLY. Don't miss it. It's a good read.  Black and white, 48 pages, no ads. Subscribe today!

DanceView is published quarterly (January, April, July and October) in Washington, D.C. Address all correspondence to:

DanceView
P.O. Box 34435
Washington, D.C. 20043

 

www.danceviewtimes.com
last updated on October 25, 2004